<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Sarah Bird, Esquire News Archive</title>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<description>Latest search engine news blog articles from Sarah Bird, Esquire.</description>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/seo-archives/author/Sarah+Bird%2C+Esquire.html</link>
<dc:title>Sarah Bird, Esquire News Archive</dc:title>
<item>
<title>Washington State Sues SEO Company Visible.net</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=13138</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, The Washington State Attorney General announced in a press release yesterday that it was suing a Redmond-based SEO company, Visible.net. According to the Complaint, Visible also does business under the name WebMarketingSource.com, Caputures.com, and Captures.com (that's not a typo). The AG also names the owner of the companies, Gilbert Walker, as a defendant in the case. The defendants sell website design, SEO,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lead Generator MostChoice Must Pay Competitor 4.8 Million Dollars For Creating Fake Leads</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=12989</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, A Jury awarded 4.8 million USD to NetQuote after finding that its competitor, MostChoice , submitted more than 3,500 false applications for insurance quotes to the NetQuote website. The jury was so disgusted with MostChoice that it actually awarded double the punitive damages that NetQuote asked for in the lawsuit. Getting punitive damages is unusual; Getting double what you asked for is extremely rare.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How to Respond to a Subpoena for User Information</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=12779</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I sincerely hope no one reading this ever needs this information. However, I have been asked privately for advice on this topic by industry folks so I thought I'd write a quick post on the topic. If you have a site that includes user-generated content, you may one day receive a subpoena asking you for personally identifying information about your users.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:06:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Copyright and Cacheing: What Happens If You Change Your Mind About Letting a Search Engine Cache Your Site?</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=12515</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Parker vs. Yahoo!, Microsoft, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74512 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2008) A federal court recently ruled that a lawsuit against Yahoo! and Microsoft for displaying cached versions of websites after the website owner has complained can go forward. Some of you may be experiencing a tingling feeling of deja vu. That's because the same plaintiff who brought this lawsuit against Yahoo!</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Jones Day Lawsuit: Mega Law Firm Sues E-Commerce Site For Linking Back To It</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=12036</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Those of you who get paid to build links aren't going to believe this one. One of the world's largest law firms, Jones Day , actually filed suit against a small e-commerce company, BlockShopper , for linking to it with the anchor text "Jones Day." Yes. I'm telling you the truth. The weird thing is BlockShopper's site wasn't defamatory, negative, or competing for services. Still,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:59:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Liability for Your Co-Blogger's Content: Another Successful CDA 230 Defense</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=11561</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers,     Attention everyone who co-blogs! If you create a blog collaboratively with another person, you may be wondering whether your fellow blogger could get you into legal trouble.     We've known for years that website operators cannot be held responsible for their users' content thanks to the broad immunities created by section 230 of the CDA. That's old news.     What's still unclear, however,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:23:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Another Trademark and SEO Related Lawsuit: U-Haul vs. Hire A Helper</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=11273</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers,     Today I'm discussing a case involving alleged trademark infringement and meta tags. It's very dangerous to outrank your competitor, especially if that competitor has limitless pockets and very generic registered trademarks. U-Haul and eMove, Inc. vs Michael Glanz and HireAHelper, Inc. United States District Court of Arizona, 2-08-cv-01271 The Parties     U-Haul owns eMove.com ,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comparative Advertsing: Can I Talk About My Competitor On My Website?</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=10752</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I am often asked, "Can I talk about my competitor on my website?"  To answer this question, I thought I would do a quick post about comparative advertising. The Federal Trade Commission promotes lawful comparative advertising as a great way to inform consumers and increase competition.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beware Pay-Per-Performance Contracts: SEM Sues Pop Phenomena 'The Secret' for Unpaid Share of Web Revenue</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=10240</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, In November 2007 I blogged about a wacky lawsuit involving the movie/book/TV phenomena called "The Secret" and an SEO, Dan Hollings. Several months have gone by and both parties have been busy. Background Summary The Secret (and all the international conglomerations and people that have a finger in ownership of The Secret ) sued Hollings for trademark infringement and violations of his alleged duty of loyalty.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trademark SEO Update: Jason Gambert Loses Two Motions and Must Ask Permission Before Filing Any More Motions</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=9970</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I have an update on the Jason Gambert Saga. For those of you wanting a refresher, please see my first post on the internet marketer trying to trademark "SEO" and my first update. When I last I provided an update, Gambert had filed 41-page response to SEOmoz's opposition proceeding and requested that all further legal proceedings be kept secret from the public.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does Your SEO Consulting Contract Have a Clause Limiting Your Liability?</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=9732</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I'm continuing my series on important contract clauses for Legal Monday. I'm looking at Limitation of Liability provisions today. A Limitation of Liability clause places a cap on the amount of money an unsatisfied client could win in Court. It is a very powerful tool to limit your risk. Important Note : Never use disclaimers of warranties, indemnifications, or limitations of liability as excuses to do bad work.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Manage Risk by Including an Indemnification Clause in Your SEO Consulting Contracts</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=9462</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Continuing my mini-series on SEO/M contract clauses, today's Legal Monday focuses on indemnification clauses . These kinds of provisions are standard in many consulting contracts. They can be extremely valuable or extremely dangerous in your contract. Therefore, it is very important to understand and use them intelligently. Even if you don't want to delve into indemnifications in your contracts, remember that larger,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why You Should Give Yourself the "Opportunity To Cure" In Your SEO Consulting Contracts</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=9192</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Last week, many of you requested more posts on common contract clauses. Your wish is my command: Today, I'm very briefly going to review "opportunity to cure" provisions. This provision is valuable for any one providing a SEO/M consulting services. Why do I need to include an "opportunity to cure" provision in my consulting contracts? Unfortunately,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Manage Client Expectations And Reduce Your Risk By Including A Warranty In Your Client Contracts</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=8912</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Today's Legal Monday is brief (for a change!), but very important for anyone doing SEO consulting. When selling their products, consultants tend to use overstate their abilities and over promise on deliverables. It is important to resist this temptation and communicate as effectively and honestly with clients as possible. A certain amount of over-selling is expected and there is even a legal word for it, "puffery.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What To Do When Google Bans Your Site Because Of A Bogus DMCA Take-Down Notice</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=8599</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I've had a few different people approach me in the last couple months because their sites have been removed by Google based on the filing of a DMCA Complaint. The notification in Google's webmaster tools looks something like this: In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Margae vs. Clear Link: The Dangers of Doing SEO By Commission and Not Having Good Contract Discipline</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=8112</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, For Legal Monday, I'm going to spotlight a case dealing with SEO, affiliate marketing, commissions-based SEO, and the importance of having a clear, written contract. The Parties In this Utah case , Margae Inc. , an internet marketing company with an odd homepage, is suing Clear Link , another internet marketing company. Clear Link is a big fish providing and managing affiliate marketing services for some hot properties,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DSW Sues Zappos.com for Trademark Infringement Over Affiliates' Review Sites</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=7845</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, DSW , a large shoe retailer, filed a federal trademark infringement case last month against Zappos.com and Commission Junction . Here's the background in brief: DSW has been operating DSWshoes.com since about 2000. The site includes information about its 200 plus brick-and-mortar stores, but does not offer direct, online shoe sales. Zappos sells shoes online. Over 840 million of them last year.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:24:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Associated Press Uses the DMCA to Try and Shut Down Bloggers</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=7528</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I have some disconcerting news to report on today's Legal Monday. In a move that it will surely regret, the Associated Press (AP) declared war on the internet. Maybe that's a slight overstatement, but the AP will certainly rue the day it decided to adopt a policy of sending DMCA take-down notices to bloggers and social news aggregators. Last week, the AP sent seven DMCA take-down notices to The Drudge Retort,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New UK Law Criminalizes Stealth Marketing Techniques</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=7043</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, It's not Monday, but I hope it's worth the wait. Our European colleagues have been buzzing about a new law prohibiting certain stealth marketing tactics. Distilled , IPA , The BBC, BigMouthMedia , The Times Online and Marketing Week have speculated on the potential fallout of the new regulation. Many have predicted the demise of common, but controversial covert marketing techniques , including paid links, fake reviews,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:11:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gambert Strikes Back!! The Confidential Official Response to SEOmoz's Opposition Proceeding</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=6718</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Happy De Facto Legal Monday! Little did I know what an exciting morning it would turn out to be! Definitely worth an update to the blog! Jason Gambert has delighted us with another literary and legal masterpiece in his misguided effort to trademark "SEO." Here's the brief refresher/update on the Gambert Saga: 1. In April, I discovered that Jason Gambert was trying to trademark the term "SEO.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:45:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Challenging New York's New Sales Tax Law: Are Affiliates Expert Sales People or Do They Just Publish Ads?</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=6367</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, There has been a lot of buzz surrounding New York's new law requiring online retailers to collect sales tax from their New York Customers if they engage affiliate marketers in that state. The New York Times ( original coverage and the Overstock fallout ), the New York Post , Vastplanet , Cost Per News, and The Wired Blog represent a handful of the coverage out there.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:58:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Two Conflicting Judicial Opinions on Using A Competitor's Trademark in Metatags</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=6098</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Today we're going to contrast two recent judicial opinions on the use of a competitor's trademark in meta-tags. Same issues; Different outcomes. Let's take a very brief look at each case. North American Medical Corp. v Axiom 2008 WL 918411 (11th Cir. April 7, 2008) The two companies involved in this suit make spinal decompression devices. Allegedly,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Florida Court's Order on Negative Keywords Will Not Break the Internet</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=5792</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Last week, there was minor uproar over a Florida District Court's Order involving negative keywords. Understandably, many SEO/Ms were anxious that the Court screwed something up that would prevent companies from bidding on their competitors' trademarks for keyword advertising. Ars Technica ran the headline "'Negative Keyword' Ruling May Have Big Impact On search Ads.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Secret: SEM Sued for Trademark Violations and Breach of Fiduciary Duty</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=5428</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please The Mozzers, Pssst.  I've got a secret. It involves the hokey pop culture phenomenon, The Secret, and the controversial SEM, Dan Hollings. Okay. I lied. It's not a secret. In fact, the whole nasty mess is public record because the owners of The Secret are suing their former internet marketer for trademark infringement and violating his duty of loyalty to them. The case, TS Merchandising v. Hollings ,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Law and Business of Online Advertising Conference Re-Cap</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=5180</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Last Friday, I had the pleasure of attending the Law and Business of Online Advertising, a conference co-sponsored by the Berkeley Center for Law &amp; Technology and University of Santa Claras High Tech Law Institute . It was a Who's Who of online marketing super stars, including Eric Goldman (my hero), Kim Howell (poor thing had to explain online marketing to liberal, non-technology academics),</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Class Action Trademark and Anti-Cybersquatting Lawsuit Against Google and Domain Parkers Gets the Green Light</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=4815</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers,     According to Google, its Adsense program for domains "allows domain name registrars and large domain name holders to unlock the value in their parked page inventory."     After a ruling by the Northern District of Illinois a few weeks ago, Adsense may also allow plaintiffs' attorneys to unlock Google's value. Or, if that is ungenerous,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pulling a Fast One: A Clever Internet Marketer Is Trying to Trademark "SEO"</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=4497</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, I was working on trademarking some SEOmoz marks the other day, when I noticed that someone is trying to register "SEO" as a service mark. I was shocked. Apparently, the guy who's doing this has managaged to get all the way to the publication stage of the registration process. That means he has passed the preliminary review by the Trademark Office's ("TMO") reviewing attorney. Currently,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Managing Risk: Legal Issues for Merchants and Affiliate Marketers</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=4204</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Welcome to Legal Monday! (It's still Monday, right?) My goal is to present a checklist of legal issues and trends surrounding affiliate marketing. I hope this will be interesting to both merchants and marketers. Affiliate marketing has unfortunately gained a bad reputation for being particularly high risk. While the industry is unlikely to ever be risk-free,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Copyright: Sample Forms and Strategies for Registering your Online Content</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=3843</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Legal Monday is here again. This week's post is part practical guide and part cybernag. Remember the post I wrote encouraging you to register your copyright back in December 2007? I bet you haven't done it yet. Am I right?  I thought so. Today, I'm breaking down the registration process even further by providing some sample registration forms and discussing strategies for how to register your content.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FTC Orders ValueClick to Pay 2.9 Million</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=3524</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, We're keeping Legal Monday short and sweet to bring you this breaking news. As many of you know, Valueclick and its subsidiaries, Hi-Speed Media and E-Babylon, have been under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") for alleged violations of the Can-Spam Act and failure to protect consumer's sensitive information.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trademark Law and Domain Names: ACPA or UDRP?</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=3140</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Happy Legal Monday! Fuel up on that caffeine because today I want to discuss how trademark law plays out in the course of a domain name dispute. We're going to compare and contract the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act with I-CANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. As I see it, there are generally three kinds of domain name disputes.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:11:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How Screwed Am I? Another Business Has the Same Name As Mine!</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=2734</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May It Please the Mozzers, Welcome to another edition of Legal Mondays!  Im very pleased to be back in town with all systems go. Before I left for vacation in February, we were looking at trademark law basics . Today, were building on the basics and moving into problem sets. Today's topic is How screwed am I? Another business has the same name as mine.</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Increasing Integrity in the Digital Marketing Industry-A Survey of Recent Cases</title>
<link>http://www.seocentro.com/cgi-bin/rss/go.pl?uid=996</link>
<description>Posted by Sarah Bird, Esquire May it Please the Mozzers, I had the pleasure of attending Law Seminars Internationals 16th Annual Seattle Conference on New Development in Technology Law last week. The place was chock full of brilliant legal minds and even a handful of techies. I want to spotlight one presentation in particular today. David Bateman , of K&amp;L Gates  spoke on policing bad behavior on the internet. (He had such a peppy,</description>
<category>Search Engines News</category>
<category>SEO News</category>
<category>Sarah Bird, Esquire</category>
<dc:creator>Sarah Bird, Esquire</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
